How Much Does an Anti-Detect Browser Cost: Price per Profile Across 6 Tools

Why comparing by plan price misleads

Every vendor in this category prices by tier, and every tier bundles a different number of profiles. That makes the sticker price almost useless as a comparison: a US$ 79 plan with a hundred profiles costs less per profile than a US$ 50 plan with sixty, per unit of the thing you are actually buying.

Worse, the tiers are drawn at deliberately incompatible points. One vendor sells 10, 50 and 100. Another sells 20 through 60 on a slider. A third does not sell profiles at all — it sells concurrent browsers, which is a different unit entirely. Line the marketing pages up side by side and you are comparing four shapes, not four prices.

So we normalised. Every figure below was read off the vendor's own public pricing page on 12 August 2026, in the currency the vendor quotes, at the standard monthly rate rather than the discounted annual one. Anything a vendor does not publish is marked not disclosed rather than estimated — this is a competitive niche, and a made-up number is ammunition against whoever printed it.

How much does an anti-detect browser cost per profile?

At the entry tier, between roughly US$ 0.50 and US$ 2.00 per profile per month. At the hundred-profile tier, between roughly US$ 0.40 and US$ 0.89. The spread narrows dramatically as volume goes up, which tells you something important: the cheap-looking small plans are the expensive ones per unit, and the expensive-looking big plans are usually the cheap ones.

Here is the entry tier — the plan each vendor sells to someone starting out.

The Dolphin Anty and GoLogin rows are the clearest illustration of why per-plan comparison fails. Dolphin's Starter is a calculator, not a plan: US$ 0.50 per profile is only true at the 20-profile step, and every additional block of ten costs US$ 10, so the marginal profile is twice the average one. GoLogin's Professional card is a selector across three prices — US$ 9 for 10 profiles, US$ 49 for 50, US$ 79 for 100 — and the per-profile cost does not fall monotonically across them: US$ 0.90, then US$ 0.98, then US$ 0.79. The middle step is the worst buy on the card, which is not something a sticker price will ever tell you.

Now the hundred-profile tier, where the vendors converge and the ranking changes:

Two vendors swap places completely between the two tables. Dolphin Anty is the cheapest per profile at the entry tier and the most expensive of the four quotable tools at a hundred. Kameleo cannot be ranked against the others at all, because it charges for how many browsers you run at once rather than how many identities you store — a genuinely different model, not a more expensive version of the same one. If your ten profiles are used one at a time, Kameleo's unit is generous; if all hundred need to be open simultaneously, it is not.

What is included and what is billed separately

The per-profile number is only the software line. Three things routinely sit outside it, and the third is the one that decides whether the tool solves your actual problem.

The fourth column is the one worth sitting with. Of six established tools, two make a public claim about the TLS layer and four do not. AdsPower's approach is to let you disable TLS features, with their own page warning that some HTTPS sites may stop working as a result — that is a real option, and it is a different thing from making your handshake look like a real Chrome. Kameleo states its TLS fingerprint is designed to resemble a real browser, which is a design claim rather than a published test.

Multilogin is the interesting one: rather than claiming coverage, their own help documentation argues that a shared JA3 or JA4 value is not something you need to make unique. That is a legitimate position, publicly stated, and it directly contradicts what several review sites say about them. If this layer matters to your operation, read their page and decide for yourself — here is why we think it matters.

Free plans: how far they go before you pay

Every vendor here has a zero-cost tier, and they are not comparable to each other either.

Note how differently "free" behaves. Incogniton's ten profiles are an introductory offer that quietly becomes three. Kameleo's free tier stores a hundred profiles but meters your actual usage in minutes. Multilogin's proxy bonus is one-time, not monthly. None of these are traps — they are all stated on the pages — but none of them are the same product either. We break the free tiers down separately here.

Where AlterAntiX fits in this math

Honestly and with a caveat we would rather state than hide: you cannot buy a paid AlterAntiX plan today. Our payment processing is still going through verification, so there is no checkout to send you to, and we are not going to print a price in a comparison table for something you cannot purchase. That would be exactly the kind of number this article exists to argue against.

What does exist is the free desktop build: three profiles, no time limit, no intro period that expires, and — this is the part that matters for the fourth column above — the TLS layer included rather than sold up. Each profile runs through its own local TLS proxy that re-emits the ClientHello using real Chrome presets, with user agents pinned to the versions those presets cover so the two layers never contradict each other.

Three profiles is not an operation. It is enough to run the comparison yourself: open two profiles side by side, load the fingerprint checker in each, and see whether the isolation is real before any money changes hands. The Windows and Linux builds are here. There is no macOS build yet.

How to calculate your real cost

The software line is the smallest term for most operations. Here is the whole formula, with every input visible:

Monthly cost per working profile =
    (plan price ÷ profiles you actually use)
  + (GB per profile per month × your provider's price per GB)
  + (extra seats × price per seat ÷ profiles you actually use)

Two of those three terms are yours, not ours — we are not going to quote a proxy rate we did not verify today. Put your own provider's per-GB price in. Worked example, using Dolphin Anty's published numbers and clearly marked assumptions for the rest:

• Plan: Base at 100 profiles, US$ 89.00 per month (published, collected 12 August 2026).
• Profiles actually used: 64, not 100 — because that is what usually happens.
• Seats: two people, so one extra user at US$ 10.00 per month (published).
• Proxy: your figure. Call it G GB per profile per month at P per GB.

Software: 89.00 ÷ 64 = US$ 1.39 per working profile. Seat: 10.00 ÷ 64 = US$ 0.16. Subtotal US$ 1.55, plus your proxy term of G × P.

Run that last term with any realistic residential-proxy rate and the conclusion is the same every time: the proxy dominates. Which reverses the usual buying instinct. People agonise over a few dollars of plan difference and then leave the largest line in the budget unexamined — which is the argument for running that number properly.

The other lesson from the arithmetic: the denominator is under your control and the numerator is not. Cutting from 50 profiles to a 20-profile plan you fully use beats hunting for a cheaper vendor at the wrong tier.

There is a fourth term the formula deliberately leaves out, because nobody can price it honestly: the cost of an account going down. It is real, it is often larger than a year of subscription, and it is also completely operation-specific — a paused ad account on a Monday morning costs an agency something very different from what it costs a hobbyist. Anyone who plugs a number in there to justify a higher plan is selling, not calculating. What you can do is note that the software line is small enough that choosing a tool on price alone, when it does not cover the layers you need, is optimising the wrong term.

When paying more per profile is worth it

Sometimes the higher unit price is the correct purchase, and it is worth being specific about when.

• When bundled proxy traffic covers you. Multilogin is the only vendor here publishing concrete GB per tier. If your consumption fits inside 1, 3 or 5 GB, that bundle can be worth more than the per-profile difference.
• When the constraint is concurrency, not storage. If you keep two hundred profiles but only ever run six at once, a concurrency-priced tool may cost less in practice despite a worse-looking unit price.
• When you need seats more than profiles. Team pricing varies by a factor of five here, from unlimited members to US$ 25 per additional user. For a five-person team that difference outweighs the plan gap.
• When the layer you need is the one you cannot see. A tool that is cheaper per profile but leaves the TLS handshake untouched is not cheaper — it is a different product. Decide which layers you need first, then compare prices among tools that cover them.